top of page
Lacunaes of the Epidemic Disease Act, 1897

Content Editor: Dr.Urmimala

February 17, 2024 at 3:30:00 PM

Public Health Laws and Acts, Epidemic Preparedness

Content Editor:  Dr.Urmimala
  • The major areas of concern in the existing Epidemic Disease Act, of 1897, were:

  1. It does not define an 'infectious disease', 'outbreak', 'epidemic', or 'pandemic'.

  2. There are no defined responsibilities for the central, state, or local authorities, hindering the effective implementation of measures.

  3. There are no proper guidelines on 'isolation' or 'quarantine'.

  4. There is a lack of a proper regulatory framework for who can conduct and regulate diagnosis during epidemics.

  5. There is no mention of an information dissemination system

  • In the report released in Feb 2024, the law commission clarifies the above discrepancies, providing newer definitions and standard operating procedures.

  • It also gave the following suggestions:

  1. Disease surveillance power is to be given to IDSP.

  2. Guidelines for proper disinfection and decontamination under the act.

  3. Multi-sectoral measures for emergency relief.

  • The report will help strengthen the law and effectively address public health emergencies

Click here to read more

bottom of page